<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Entertainment Law Brazil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:05:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Screen Quota for 2012 by Francisco</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/2012/01/02/screen-quota-for-2012/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/?p=804#comment-839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the link. 
Here in Argentina we also have an screen quota but, as usual, nobody cares about it. It is common, for example, for Argentinian movies to be screened in the smallest screen, on a saturday at 13.30 PM! And because the law allows the complex to take the movie out of the screen if it is not viewed by a certain number of persons...
Regarding your proposal, it is excellent. My email is fjdz at suayabilbao.com, please send me an email and we&#039;ll take it from there.
Regards,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link.<br />
Here in Argentina we also have an screen quota but, as usual, nobody cares about it. It is common, for example, for Argentinian movies to be screened in the smallest screen, on a saturday at 13.30 PM! And because the law allows the complex to take the movie out of the screen if it is not viewed by a certain number of persons&#8230;<br />
Regarding your proposal, it is excellent. My email is fjdz at suayabilbao.com, please send me an email and we&#8217;ll take it from there.<br />
Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Screen Quota for 2012 by entertainmentlawbrazil</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/2012/01/02/screen-quota-for-2012/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[entertainmentlawbrazil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/?p=804#comment-838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Francisco,
Thanks for reading our blog. I noticed that you have quite an interesting blog yourself! Maybe we could share our “blogging” experience by publishing each other’s posts a couple of times, what do you think?

As to your question, that is exactly it: if a complex has one screen, it has to show at least 3 different Brazilian movies for at least 28 days (total) in 2012.

Regarding the link, sorry for that. I have updated the post accordingly.

Attilio]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francisco,<br />
Thanks for reading our blog. I noticed that you have quite an interesting blog yourself! Maybe we could share our “blogging” experience by publishing each other’s posts a couple of times, what do you think?</p>
<p>As to your question, that is exactly it: if a complex has one screen, it has to show at least 3 different Brazilian movies for at least 28 days (total) in 2012.</p>
<p>Regarding the link, sorry for that. I have updated the post accordingly.</p>
<p>Attilio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Screen Quota for 2012 by Francisco</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/2012/01/02/screen-quota-for-2012/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/?p=804#comment-834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don´t know if I understand the chart. For example if a complex has only one screen then it should show a minimum of 3 brazilian titles in a minumum of 28 days in the year. Am I right? 
Also, a link to the decree would be nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don´t know if I understand the chart. For example if a complex has only one screen then it should show a minimum of 3 brazilian titles in a minumum of 28 days in the year. Am I right?<br />
Also, a link to the decree would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bill of Copyright Law sent to the Civil House? by entertainmentlawbrazil</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/2011/11/28/bill-of-copyright-law-sent-to-the-civil-house/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[entertainmentlawbrazil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/?p=768#comment-821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hernan, thank you and good catch! I missed this for some reason.

However, this is not an announcement per se but rather a rebuttal of the article published in Folha de São Paulo which accuses the Ministry of Culture of favoring ECAD, the music public performance collection society. The interesting aspect to notice is that the Ministry of Culture does not acknowledge that Folha’s version of the pre-draft bill is the Ministry’s pre-draft bill. I can’t understand why the Ministry of Culture does not publish whatever version they sent to the Civil House. This “mistery” only creates animosities.

But, again, thank you very much for this!

Regards,
Attilio.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hernan, thank you and good catch! I missed this for some reason.</p>
<p>However, this is not an announcement per se but rather a rebuttal of the article published in Folha de São Paulo which accuses the Ministry of Culture of favoring ECAD, the music public performance collection society. The interesting aspect to notice is that the Ministry of Culture does not acknowledge that Folha’s version of the pre-draft bill is the Ministry’s pre-draft bill. I can’t understand why the Ministry of Culture does not publish whatever version they sent to the Civil House. This “mistery” only creates animosities.</p>
<p>But, again, thank you very much for this!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Attilio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bill of Copyright Law sent to the Civil House? by hernan ruben sa</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/2011/11/28/bill-of-copyright-law-sent-to-the-civil-house/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hernan ruben sa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/?p=768#comment-812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attilio, is this the announcement you were waiting for?
http://www.cultura.gov.br/site/2011/12/01/direito-autoral-27/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attilio, is this the announcement you were waiting for?<br />
<a href="http://www.cultura.gov.br/site/2011/12/01/direito-autoral-27/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cultura.gov.br/site/2011/12/01/direito-autoral-27/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Blog by Manuela Oliveira</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/sobre/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuela Oliveira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, 


My name is Manuela . I am the Brazilian  assistant editor at The Law Insider (thelawinsider.com) a legal blog that publishes law related news and information. I read your blog, The Entertainment Law Brazil, and thought I should reach out to you and introduce myself. I would love to establish a relationship with your blog and discuss the possibility of having us do a guest-blog post on your site-- or alternatively-- inviting you to do a guest piece on ours. At very least, I wanted to say hello and welcome any thoughts or feedback you might have for us. 


I&#039;d love to hear from you and hope we can build a blogging relationship!


All the best,


Manuela Oliveira
Assistant Editor
The Law Insider
thelawinsider.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>My name is Manuela . I am the Brazilian  assistant editor at The Law Insider (thelawinsider.com) a legal blog that publishes law related news and information. I read your blog, The Entertainment Law Brazil, and thought I should reach out to you and introduce myself. I would love to establish a relationship with your blog and discuss the possibility of having us do a guest-blog post on your site&#8211; or alternatively&#8211; inviting you to do a guest piece on ours. At very least, I wanted to say hello and welcome any thoughts or feedback you might have for us. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear from you and hope we can build a blogging relationship!</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>Manuela Oliveira<br />
Assistant Editor<br />
The Law Insider<br />
thelawinsider.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Case of Olympic Plagiarism? by Robby L</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/2011/01/14/a-case-of-olympic-plagiarism/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robby L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 03:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/?p=567#comment-744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all like to be understanding  but this is one of the most obvious instantaneous of plagiarism I have ever seen.  I have read the attempts to deflect he obvious similarities but it is undeniable.. I live in Brazil. Why own when we can just borrow?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all like to be understanding  but this is one of the most obvious instantaneous of plagiarism I have ever seen.  I have read the attempts to deflect he obvious similarities but it is undeniable.. I live in Brazil. Why own when we can just borrow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The first 365 days by Nils Montan</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/2011/04/07/676/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nils Montan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/?p=676#comment-741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations guys. It&#039;s not easy keeping a blog going for a year and you have done it with style and grace.  Great year-end summary too.  Thanks so much,

Nils]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations guys. It&#8217;s not easy keeping a blog going for a year and you have done it with style and grace.  Great year-end summary too.  Thanks so much,</p>
<p>Nils</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t Make me Steal Manifesto by Nils Montan</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/2011/02/22/dont-make-me-steal-manifesto/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nils Montan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/?p=627#comment-696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a fascinating idea.  I would really like to learn more about the manifesto.  The movie industry will have to do something pronto to avoid going the way of the music industry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fascinating idea.  I would really like to learn more about the manifesto.  The movie industry will have to do something pronto to avoid going the way of the music industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on According to IFPI’s new report, Brazil ranks second place in digital piracy by Tuesday: Piracy all over &#124; Knockoff Report</title>
		<link>http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/2011/01/31/according-to-ifpi%e2%80%99s-new-report-brazil-ranks-second-place-in-digital-piracy/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tuesday: Piracy all over &#124; Knockoff Report]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainmentlawbrazil.com.br/?p=612#comment-678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] According to IFPI’s new report, Brazil ranks second place in digital piracy [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to IFPI’s new report, Brazil ranks second place in digital piracy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
